August 24, 2026:

Plus, Texas intervenes in surrogacy legal fight and parts of Idaho’s abortion laws are declared unconstitutional.

Each week, Rewire News Group editors scour headlines nationwide—from lawsuits over abortion access to LGBTQ+ rights—to bring you the most urgent news in reproductive justice. Here’s what you need to know from the past week’s biggest stories.
Last week, President Donald Trump nominated anti-choice physician Heidi Overton to lead the FDA. Overton has long attacked abortion. In 2022, she lauded the overturn of Roe v. Wade as an opportunity to “choose life through a democratic process.” She also called abortion medication “dangerous to women,” despite scientific consensus that the pills are safe and effective. If confirmed, Overton would oversee the agency’s highly-criticized “review” of mifepristone’s safety that began in June under ex-FDA chief Marty Makary.
All eyes are on a multi-state legal battle between a surrogate and the biological parents of a baby, born Aug. 12 with a rare heart defect. The biological parents wanted the surrogate to have an abortion when the condition was detected during pregnancy. She refused, then fled from California to Texas, which has a near-total abortion ban. A judge ordered the baby receive life-saving treatment at birth. It’s unclear what happens next, but a judge barred the surrogate from making further medical decisions.
A federal judge found parts of Idaho’s abortion ban unconstitutional last week, saying people must be able to end a pregnancy that risks their health or life, and that providers who help them may not be prosecuted. “A pregnant woman’s health is not a state resource to be allocated at the legislature’s whim,” wrote District Judge B. Lynn Winmill, a Clinton appointee. Two Idaho laws—the “Defense of Life Act” and “Fetal Heartbeat Act”—bar abortion almost entirely. In November, Idaho voters will decide if these laws need loosening.
And, in Chicago, a Seventh Circuit appeals court permanently blocked Indiana from penalizing Planned Parenthood for directing pregnant minors to out-of-state abortion services. The three-court panel ruled that providing factual information about abortion, including referrals, is protected by the First Amendment.
This news roundup is adapted from our newsletter, Rewire Weekly. Sign up here to get the latest reproductive rights news, expert analysis, and a peek into the RNG newsroom—fresh to your inbox.
Source