USA India Australia Africa
Home Celebrities Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s Wedding NDA Lacks Penalties for Guests
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s Wedding NDA Lacks Penalties for Guests

June 30, 2026:

Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s Wedding NDA Lacks Penalties for Guests

Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce Wedding
NDA Is All Bark, No Bite!!!

Published

travis kelce taylor swift nda

Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce‘s NDA for wedding guests may look intimidating … but TMZ has learned it doesn’t have much bite, because guests who violate it won’t face any obvious financial punishment.

Sources with direct knowledge tell TMZ … the electronic non-disclosure agreement sent to guests does not include a monetary penalty — or any other punishment for that matter — if one dared to violate the agreement.

We’re also told there’s no film release attached, meaning guests weren’t asked to sign away their rights to appear on camera — making a wedding streaming special or documentary seem pretty unlikely.

Taylor Swift And Travis Kelce's Engagement Photos

As TMZ first reported … between 1,100 and 1,200 guests are expected at Madison Square Garden July 3 to celebrate the couple tying the knot.

The NDA is just one piece of an elaborate security plan.

We broke the story … Taylor and Travis individually watermarked every invitation with each guest’s first and last name repeated throughout, making it easy to trace any invite that ends up online.

While letting details slip won’t cost ya any cash, there is the threat of public shaming from other guests or the possibility of being uninvited.

Invitations also listed only “New York City” and the July 3 date — not Madison Square Garden — keeping the exact venue under wraps.

As we reported, a permit was filed with New York City to close streets surrounding Madison Square Garden from July 2 through midday July 4 for festivities tied to a July 3 event.

sub msg getty

The wedding bash is just days away … so if anyone wants to break the NDA, and risk pissing off the bride and groom, the clock is ticking. Just sayin’ 🤷.

Source link

tags
Abkhazia Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Curacao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Eswatini Ethiopia Fiji Finland France French Polynesia Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North Korea North Macedonia Northern Cyprus Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Republic of the Congo Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Togo Tonga Transnistria Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvalu Uganda UK Ukraine United Arab Emirates Uruguay USA Uzbekistan Vanuatu Vatican City Venezuela Vietnam Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe