Qualcomm is making major strides in mobile processing by introducing custom Oryon cores in a smartphone processor. Now, the generational improvements have made their way across Qualcomm’s chip portfolio — even to processors that don’t bear the “Elite” branding.
This makes it tricky to compare the performance capabilities across smartphone models and chip generations. For instance, Motorola’s new Razr Ultra 2026 is powered by the last-generation Snapdragon 8 Elite chip. By comparison, the Razr Fold runs on a newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 mobile platform, just the non-Elite version.
I wanted to see whether an older Elite chip or a newer “base” chip offered better performance, so I put the Razr Ultra 2026 and the Razr Fold through a six-text benchmark gauntlet. The results weren’t what I expected.
Latest Videos FromAndroid Central
How I tested the Razr flagships
I put the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Motorola Razr Fold through a series of six tests, each designed to gauge a specific aspect of device performance. To test CPU performance, which affects how snappy your device feels when opening apps and during basic use, I used both Geekbench 6 and Geekbench 7. For on-device AI testing, I ran Geekbench AI and its TensorFlow Lite framework. To see how the phones handled gaming and graphics-based tests, I ran 3DMark’s Wild Life Extreme benchmark and stress test.
I ran each benchmark test three times, starting the next run immediately after the first one finished. This provides a clean average of the results that is more representative of real-world performance than a single run. Running the benchmark trials in quick succession hints at how the Razr Ultra 2026 and the Motorola Razr Fold handle sustained loads, and whether the phones experience major thermal throttling.
After completing three runs of each benchmark test, I allowed the phones to cool down before beginning the next test. This ensures the strain of former tests isn’t impacting the performance of a current test.
CPU and AI benchmark performance
The Snapdragon 8 Elite chip inside the Razr Ultra 2026 features two prime CPU cores that can be clocked up to 4.32GHz, plus six more performance CPU cores that can reach 3.53GHz. Meanwhile, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 chip inside the Razr Fold is built on newer Oryon Gen 3 prime CPU cores, but they are only clocked at up to 3.8GHz. The processor’s six performance CPU cores can hit up to 3.32GHz.
So, the older Elite chip offers higher clock speeds, and the base Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 chip has newer prime cores. Since the two chips have the same number of prime and performance CPU cores, the Razr Ultra 2026 and the Razr Fold’s benchmark results should be in the same ballpark. Let’s see how they turned out.
|
Device/chip |
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
Test 3 |
Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Motorola Razr Fold (Snapdragon 8 Gen 5) |
2,612 single-core / 8,809 multi-core |
2,596 single-core / 8,480 multi-core |
2,572 single-core / 8,388 multi-core |
2,593 single-core / 8,559 multi-core |
|
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (Snapdragon 8 Elite) |
2,830 single-core / 8,372 multi-core |
2,782 single-core / 8,261 multi-core |
2,762 single-core / 8,170 multi-core |
2,791 single-core / 8,268 multi-core |
In Geekbench 6, the older Snapdragon 8 Elite chip consistently beat the newer base Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 processor by a few hundred points in single-core CPU performance. The Razr Fold averaged a 2,593 single-core score, whereas the Razr Ultra 2026 averaged a 2,791 single-core score. This kind of performance is what makes your phone feel fast when opening apps, loading webpages, or navigating the UI. Despite the Razr Ultra 2026’s older chip and constrained form factor, the Elite processor still wins here.
As for multi-core performance, the Razr Fold manages to pull more out of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5’s eight CPU cores. The newer, base chip’s best benchmark run resulted in a multi-core score of 8,809, and an average of 8,559. The Razr Ultra 2026 was notably behind, putting up an 8,268 multi-core score. Essentially, this means the Razr Fold’s non-Elite chip will be better for multitasking and parallel workloads than the Razr Ultra 2026’s older Elite chip — at least as configured here.
In terms of performance trends, each phone unsurprisingly posted its best result on the first try. However, the three CPU tests didn’t cause either phone to noticeably throttle. The results for the second and third trials weren’t too far off what we saw in the first run.
|
Device/chip |
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
Test 3 |
Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Motorola Razr Fold (Snapdragon 8 Gen 5) |
1,082 single-core / 5,883 multi-core |
1,077 single-core / 5,935 multi-core |
1,103 single-core / 5,717 multi-core |
1,087 single-core / 5,845 multi-core |
|
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (Snapdragon 8 Elite) |
1,235 single-core / 6,787 multi-core |
1,018 single-core / 6,697 multi-core |
990 single-core / 6,848 multi-core |
1,081 single-core / 6,777 multi-core |
Geekbench 6 is widely used for smartphone comparisons and chip benchmarking, but Geekbench 7 is here. This updated test offers “both new and improved workloads to measure the performance of your CPUs and GPUs.” In other words, it’s better built to test how phones and chips will handle the demanding AI and media workflows used in 2026.
The results painted a different picture. While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 chip in the Razr Fold was better at multi-core performance in the Geekbench 6 test, the opposite was true using the Geekbench 7 benchmark. The older Snapdragon 8 Elite processor in the Razr Ultra 2026 posted multi-core scores as much as over 1,000 points higher than the newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 chip in the Razr Fold.
Single-core performance was about the same across the two phones and chips. The shift in multi-core performance does beg the question: Is the older Elite chip actually better-positioned for modern multitasking?
|
Device/chip |
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
Test 3 |
Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Motorola Razr Fold (Snapdragon 8 Gen 5) |
4,101 quantized score |
3,726 quantized score |
3,968 quantized score |
3,932 quantized score |
|
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (Snapdragon 8 Elite) |
3,586 quantized score |
3,248 quantized score |
2,900 quantized score |
3,245 quantized score |
If you care about on-device AI performance, it seems having a newer chip is more important than having an “Elite” one. The base Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 averaged a Geekbench AI quantized score of 3,932, whereas the Snapdragon 8 Elite was further behind with an average score of 3,245.
GPU benchmark performance
Perhaps the most surprising part of this test was seeing the difference in GPU performance between the two Motorola flagships. I used 3D Mark’s Wild Life Extreme, a 4K UHD gaming benchmark, to push each phone and processor to its limits in a one-minute test. The results were clear: the older Elite chip in the Razr Ultra 2026 is better for gaming and graphics-heavy tasks.
The Snapdragon 8 Elite processor in the Razr Ultra 2026 averaged 32.36 frames per second across the three minute-long trials. Meanwhile, the Razr Fold could only muster a 25.04 average FPS. The final scores showed the same result: the Razr Ultra 2026 averaged a 5,404 overall score, while the Razr Fold averaged a 4,181 overall score. I should note that I ran every test on the Razr Fold’s cover display, so the foldable wasn’t being penalized for having a larger internal screen.
|
Device/chip |
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
Test 3 |
Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Motorola Razr Fold (Snapdragon 8 Gen 5) |
4,307 overall score; 25.79 average FPS |
4,340 overall score; 25.99 average FPS |
3,897 overall score; 23.34 average FPS |
4,181 overall score; 25.04 average FPS |
|
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (Snapdragon 8 Elite) |
5,743 overall score; 34.39 average FPS |
5,614 overall score; 33.62 average FPS |
4,855 overall score; 29.08 average FPS |
5,404 overall score; 32.36 average FPS |
Keen-eyed readers will notice that the Razr Ultra 2026’s graphics performance really started to tail off in the third trial. Frame rates dipped under 30FPS, and the overall score was nearly 1,000 points lower than the first trial. This is a sign of thermal throttling, and it’s a foreshadowing of what happened in our final test.
|
Device/chip |
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
Test 3 |
Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Motorola Razr Fold (Snapdragon 8 Gen 5) |
9,332 |
13,430 |
13,155 |
11,972 |
|
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (Snapdragon 8 Elite) |
10,263 |
12,866 |
13,405 |
12,178 |
Before that, though, we have the Geekbench 7 GPU benchmark results. Oddly, each phone performed at its worst in the first trial run. Performance stabilized in the second and third runs, which is the opposite of what we’re used to seeing. The Razr Fold had the highest-scoring trial, but the Razr Ultra 2026 finished with a higher average score.
Stress test results
My final test was 3DMark’s Wild Life Extreme stress test. It’s one of my favorite tests to run on phones, because it’s excellent at showing how they will perform under sustained heavy loads.
Specifically, the Wild Life Extreme stress test forces phones to render high-resolution 4K UHD game visuals for 20 minutes. Rather than providing a single score at the end, the stress test shows how performance and temperature changed over time throughout the 20-minute test.
I planned to make a big chart showing how the Razr Fold and Razr Ultra 2026 performed under heavy loads, but I couldn’t. That’s because the Razr Ultra 2026 couldn’t finish the stress test without overheating, and it didn’t even come close.
Just a few minutes into each stress test attempt, the Razr Ultra 2026 overheated and force-stopped the Wild Life Extreme stress test. This is certainly a bad result, and it’s a sign that the Elite chip might be a tad bit too powerful for the small form factor of a clamshell foldable.
The Razr Fold and its Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 chip did complete the stress test with 56.5% stability. This isn’t the best I’ve seen, but it isn’t the worst either. The phone’s highest stress test loop score was 4,946, and the lowest was 2,801, so there’s a lot of fluctuation. It does thermal throttle, but hey, it finished.
The stress test results (or lack thereof) show why we can’t just stop at classic benchmarks when evaluating phones and chips. The Snapdragon 8 Elite chip in the Razr Ultra 2026 is better in benchmarks, but the stress test failure proves you’ll never be able to maximize it in sustained loads.
Verdict
Overall, it’s clear that whether a phone has an Elite chip or not shouldn’t factor highly into your purchasing decision. It’s true that the older Snapdragon 8 Elite chip did outperform the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 chips on a few occasions. However, the newer design of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 helped it come out ahead in on-device AI performance. If anything, the takeaway here is that a base Snapdragon chip is better than an Elite chip that runs too hot for your phone to handle.